Evaluating next-generation sequencing in neuromuscular diseases with neonatal respiratory distress.

With the exception of infantile spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and congenital myotonic dystrophy 1 (DM1), congenital myopathies and muscular dystrophies with neonatal respiratory distress pose diagnostic challenges. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides hope for the diagnosis of these rare diseases. We evaluated the efficiency of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in ventilated newborns with peripheral hypotonia. We compared the results of our previous study in a cohort of 19 patients analysed by Sanger sequencing from 2007 to 2012, with a diagnostic yield of 26% (5/19), and those of a new retrospective study in 28 patients from 2007 to 2018 diagnosed using MyoPanel, a neuromuscular disease panel, with a diagnostic yield of 43% (12/28 patients). Pathogenic variants were found in five genes: ACTA1 (n = 4 patients), RYR1 (n = 2), CACNA1S (n = 1), NEB (n = 3), and MTM1 (n = 2). Myopanel increased the diagnosis of congenital neuromuscular diseases, but more than half the patients remained undiagnosed. Whole exome sequencing did not seem to fully respond to this diagnostic limitation. Therefore, explorations with whole genome sequencing will be the next step.

Clinical phenotype and loss of the slow skeletal muscle troponin T in three new patients with recessive TNNT1 nemaline myopathy.

BACKGROUND: Congenital nemaline myopathies are rare pathologies characterised by muscle weakness and rod-shaped inclusions in the muscle fibres. METHODS: Using next-generation sequencing, we identified three patients with pathogenic variants in the Troponin T type 1 (TNNT1) gene, coding for the troponin T (TNT) skeletal muscle isoform. RESULTS: The clinical phenotype was similar in all patients, associating hypotonia, orthopaedic deformities and progressive chronic respiratory failure, leading to early death. The anatomopathological phenotype was characterised by a disproportion in the muscle fibre size, endomysial fibrosis and nemaline rods. Molecular analyses of TNNT1 revealed a homozygous deletion of exons 8 and 9 in patient 1; a heterozygous nonsense mutation in exon 9 and retention of part of intron 4 in muscle transcripts in patient 2; and a homozygous, very early nonsense mutation in patient 3.Western blot analyses confirmed the absence of the TNT protein resulting from these mutations. DISCUSSION: The clinical and anatomopathological presentations of our patients reinforce the homogeneous character of the phenotype associated with recessive TNNT1 mutations. Previous studies revealed an impact of recessive variants on the tropomyosin-binding affinity of TNT. We report in our patients a complete loss of TNT protein due to open reading frame disruption or to post-translational degradation of TNT.